⚖️ Year 8 Religious Education
Applied ethics — war and peace, environmental responsibility, medical decisions, and social justice, through multiple religious and secular perspectives.
War & Peace
Religious Views on War
- Pacifism: the belief that violence and war are never justified under any circumstances. Some Quakers, Jehovah's Witnesses, some Buddhists are absolute pacifists.
- Just War Theory: the idea that war can be morally justified under certain strict conditions. Developed by St Augustine and St Thomas Aquinas in Christian tradition; parallels exist in Islam (Jihad) and Judaism.
The Just War Criteria
- The war must be fought for a just cause (self-defence, protecting the innocent, correcting a grave injustice)
- It must be declared by a legitimate authority (not a rebel group or terrorist organisation)
- The intention must be good (peace must be the aim)
- It must be a last resort (all peaceful alternatives must have been tried and failed)
- There must be a reasonable chance of success
- The means must be proportionate — only necessary force used; civilians protected
Islam and War
- Islam means "submission to God" and is linguistically related to "salam" (peace)
- Lesser Jihad (Jihad bil Sayf): physical struggle; can include fighting to defend the Muslim community from unjust attack. Strict conditions apply (very similar to Just War criteria)
- Greater Jihad: the spiritual struggle against sin and one's own ego (considered more important in most scholarly traditions)
- The Qur'an: "Fight in the way of Allah those who fight you but do not transgress. Indeed, Allah does not like transgressors." (2:190)
- Islam prohibits targeting civilians, destroying crops, killing animals unnecessarily, or using excessive force
Christian Views on Peace
- Jesus taught forgiveness and non-retaliation: "Turn the other cheek"; "Blessed are the peacemakers"
- Christian pacifists (e.g. Quakers) believe Jesus's life was a model of non-violence; Christians should not participate in war
- Most mainstream Christians accept the Just War theory as a framework for reluctant, defensive violence
- Nuclear weapons: many Christians argue they can never be proportionate; others argue they function as a deterrent and prevent war
Terrorism
- Terrorism: the use of violence against civilians to create fear and achieve political goals
- All major world religions condemn terrorism; extremists may misuse religion to justify it
- The debate: is one person's terrorist another's freedom fighter? Context and perspective matter in evaluating this ethically.
- Causes of terrorism: political grievances, injustice, extremist ideology, alienation, foreign policy
Environmental Ethics
Religious Teachings on the Environment
- Christianity: Genesis — God gave humans "dominion" over creation (sometimes interpreted as permission to use nature, but increasingly as stewardship — responsible care). "The Lord God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to tend and keep it." (Gen 2:15). Pope Francis's Laudato Si (2015): a strong call for environmental protection as a religious duty.
- Islam: Khalifah — humans are "stewards" (vice-regents) of the Earth on behalf of Allah. The Earth belongs to Allah, not humanity. Causing pollution or waste is forbidden (fasad). The concept of Mizan (balance) — humans must maintain the natural balance God created.
- Judaism: Tikkun Olam ("repairing the world") — human responsibility to improve the world. Bal Tashchit — the prohibition against needless destruction; waste is a moral failing.
- Hinduism: Ahimsa (non-violence/non-harm) applies to all living beings; the natural world is sacred. Many Hindus see rivers (especially the Ganges) as goddesses — though this can paradoxically coexist with pollution.
- Buddhism: interdependence (Pratītyasamutpāda) — all things are connected; harming the environment harms us. Mindful consumption — avoiding desire and waste.
Secular Environmental Ethics
- Anthropocentrism: humans are the most important beings; nature has value only as it serves human needs. Has justified much environmental destruction.
- Biocentrism: all living beings have intrinsic value, not just humans (Peter Singer, animal rights)
- Ecocentrism: the entire ecosystem (including non-living things) has intrinsic value; humans are one part of a complex web
Key Issues
- Climate change and our duty to future generations
- Animal welfare vs human use of animals (factory farming, animal testing)
- Pollution and the global commons — who is responsible when damage crosses borders?
- Consumption and global justice — rich nations consume vastly more per capita
Medical Ethics
Abortion
- Abortion: the deliberate termination of a pregnancy. In the UK, legal up to 24 weeks (Abortion Act 1967).
- Pro-life view: life begins at conception; the foetus has a right to life; abortion is wrong. Held by Roman Catholics, many Evangelicals, some Muslims.
- Pro-choice view: a woman has the right to make decisions about her own body; the foetus is not yet a person with full rights. Secular and many liberal religious perspectives.
- The debate centres on: when does personhood begin? Whose rights take priority? What are the social consequences of restricting abortion?
- Religious nuance: many traditions do not take an absolute position. Islam generally permits abortion early in pregnancy in extreme circumstances. Judaism generally permits abortion to save the mother's life.
Euthanasia
- Euthanasia: bringing about the death of someone suffering from a terminal illness to end their suffering
- Voluntary euthanasia: the person requests it. Active: a direct action causes death (e.g. lethal injection); Passive: life-sustaining treatment is withdrawn.
- Assisted dying/suicide: providing the means for someone to end their own life
- Euthanasia is illegal in the UK; legal in Belgium, Netherlands, Switzerland (assisted dying) and several US states
- Arguments for: right to die with dignity, reduction of suffering, bodily autonomy
- Arguments against: the sanctity of life, the "slippery slope" concern, pressure on the vulnerable, palliative care as an alternative
- Religious views: most religious traditions oppose euthanasia (life is God's gift; suffering can have meaning). The Catholic "doctrine of double effect" allows treatment that may hasten death if the primary aim is to relieve pain.
Organ Donation & Transplants
- UK changed to an opt-out system in 2020 (Max and Keira's Law): all adults are presumed to consent unless they have opted out
- Most religious traditions support organ donation as an act of charity (saving another's life is a great virtue in Islam, Judaism, and Christianity)
- Some objections: body must be whole for resurrection; concern about definition of brain death; distrust of the medical system
Justice & Human Rights
What Is Justice?
- Justice: fair treatment; giving people what they deserve or what they are owed
- Distributive justice: fair distribution of resources and opportunities in society
- Retributive justice: punishment fitting the crime; the wrongdoer receives what they deserve
- Restorative justice: repairing the harm done; offenders make amends to those they have wronged; increasingly used in schools and criminal justice
Aims of Punishment
- Retribution: the criminal deserves to suffer proportionately for their crime ("an eye for an eye")
- Deterrence: punishment deters the offender (individual) and others (general) from future crime
- Rehabilitation: reforming the offender so they do not reoffend; education, therapy, skills training in prison
- Protection: keeping dangerous people away from society
- Reparation: making amends (community service, paying compensation)
The Death Penalty
- Capital punishment is used in approximately 55 countries; abolished in the UK in 1969
- Arguments for: ultimate deterrent, justice for victims, removes dangerous criminals permanently, proportionate for the worst crimes
- Arguments against: risk of executing innocent people, does not demonstrably deter crime, violates the right to life, state-sanctioned killing is morally wrong
- Religious views: divided. Old Testament supports it; Christian tradition mixed. Islam permits it under very strict conditions. Buddhism and most humanists oppose it.
Global Poverty and Inequality
- Approximately 700 million people live in extreme poverty (below $2.15/day, 2022 World Bank)
- Religious duty to the poor: Zakat (Islamic obligatory almsgiving 2.5%); Christian charity and the preferential option for the poor (Liberation Theology); Tzedakah (Jewish justice/charity); Seva (Sikh selfless service to community)
- Fair trade movement: ensuring producers in LICs receive fair prices for their goods
- Non-religious responses: humanitarian aid organisations (Oxfam, MSF), government development aid, debt relief campaigns